Texas Gov. Rick Perry is losing and acting like he's got nothing to lose -- skewering fellow Republicans running for president as wimpy job creators and congressional Republicans who spent to much money long before before President Obama was elected.

"Obama has thrown gasoline on the fire," Perry said at the NBC News/Facebook debate on Sunday. "But the bonfire was burning well before Obama got there. It was policies and spending both from Wall Street and from the insiders in Washington, D.C., that got us in this problem."

When asked if current front-runner, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, was electable, Perry said: "I look from here down to Rick Santorum, I see insiders. Individuals who been big spending Republicans in Washington, D.C." (Perry was exempting former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who stood to Santorum's right).

Perry has registered 1 percent in the last five polls taken in New Hampshire. He has registered 5 points in the last three South Carolina polls.


Look no further for why he did what he did on Sunday. By the end of the debate, Perry had clashed  with Republicans on stage as unelectable, with Republicans in Congress who spent too much, and with the party nominee -- John McCain -- who said Obama was a patriot worthy to lead America. 


In ways he hasn't tried before, Perry also tried to tap into the tea party movement that first rattled the GOP establishment in 2010 through primary challenges and then changed Congress by helping propel Republicans to power in the House (though tea party-fueled Senate candidates failed in Delaware, Nevada and Colorado).


"We need a candidate that can not only draw that stark contrast between themselves and Barack Obama but also stand up and lead the Tea Party movement," Perry said. "2010 was about the tea party standing up and understanding that Republicans, big spending Republicans, had caused...as much of this problem as anything."


At another stage of the debate, Perry said "I hope I'm making Republicans uncomfortable right now by talking about all the spending they've done back in the 2000s when we had control of both (houses of Congress). There's a bunch of people standing up here  that say they're conservatives, but their record doesn't follow up on that."


Perry saved his toughest criticism, however, for Obama. "I make a very proud statement and a fact that we have a president who is a socialist," he said. "I don't think our founding fathers wanted America to be a socialist country. So I disagree with that premise that somehow or another President Obama reflects our founding fathers. He doesn't."


The "premise" Perry disagreed with was that articulated in a Washington Post column written by McCain, the GOP's 2008 nominee, that Obama "was a patriot sincerely intent upon using his time in office to advance our country's cause." McCain also said in the column he rejected "accusations that (Obama's) policies and beliefs make him unworthy to lead America or opposed to its founding ideals."


In a light moment underscoring that Perry has on stake in New Hampshire, the Texas governor recalled without difficulty, the three cabinet departments he would close - energy, commerce and education -- in answer to a question about what he would cut in Washington to reduce federal spending. Perry waded into these water, knowing titters would roll through the audience, for reminding voters he couldn't name the three departments (his famous "oops" moment) at an earlier debate.


"It would be those bureaucrats at the departments of Commerce and Energy and Education that we are gonna do away with," Perry said, a broad and satisfied smile on his face as applause arose from the theater.


Perry then raised three fingers as if to proclaim "I nailed it this time" while Santorum raised three fingers back to Perry in mock tribute as more laughter arose in the hall. Debate moderator David Gregory, host of Meet the Press, said: "And that's your final answer." Perry played along and nodded and smiled, extending a bit long the stand-up-comedy
interlude.


Perry's campaign isn't a parody, though it has vastly under-performed and is the verge of being one of the worst in modern GOP history. Perry's playing, it seems, more and more like a joke - or a place where his only mission is to disagree with all things not his own. 


The joke may have been on his financial supporters. Pretty soon, the only thing Perry will truly be able to call his own is the timing and location of his exit from the race.

Florida Republicans presently favor Texas Gov. Rick Perry by a minor margin over ex Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in their party's fight to locate a contestant to face President Barack Obama next year, a fresh survey revealed Thursday shows.

Perry was preferred by 28% of the 374 registered Republican voters compared to 22% who would like to see Romney as their candidate. The random telephone review, made Sept. 14-19 Quinnipiac University, has a margin of mistake of plus or minus 5.1% points. No other Republican presidential confident in the prevalent field of nominees received two-digit support.

The survey comes out ahead of Thursday afternoon's nominee forum and an evening debate in swing-state Florida.

Perry's lead over Romney was even largest should ex Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin stay out of the competition and also between GOP voters who explained themselves as ingredient of the Tea Party movement.

Perry was preferred by 32% of Republicans to 21% who admired Romney significant in a race without Palin. The Texas governor led Romney 55% to 35% among Tea Party folks.

Though, Quinnipiac's survey appeared Obama would be much harder to beat if Perry becomes the Republican candidate, greatly because Perry has work to do with voters freely of either biggest political party.

Romney, in a wider poll of 1,007 registered voters, was preferred by 47% to Obama's 40%. Obama had a statistically pointless 44-42 edge in a matchup with Perry. That larger sampling had a margin of mistake of 3.1%.

Perry also has work to do with Florida elders on his conviction that Social Security is a "Ponzi scheme." The 58% said it was unjust to illustrate Social Security as a "Ponzi scheme," and there was practically no favor for declining Social Security with the exemption of raising the cap from the present $106,800 in salary subject to the tax.

Though Obama carried Florida by an easier margin in his 2008 winning over Republican John McCain, 53% of those inquired in the Quinnipiac poll said the president does not justify a second term compared to 41% who think he does.

Florida's 29 electoral votes are the most of any state thought to be a swing state in the 2012 general vote.

http://currentsnews2011.blogspot.com/